Yes, a Blue Wave!! Now, what?

Well, I guess we won’t be getting our $5,000 each.  Which is unfortunate, because I spent most of my $2,000 tariff rebate on a couple Omaha steaks and a tank of gas.  It’s the price we pay for democracy.  According to a White House source, the President spent Wednesday, the day after the Republican defeat, which looked a bit like Napoleon’s retreat from Russia, in a wise use of his time – reviewing plans for his new ballroom.  That’s the spirit, Donald.  “Let them eat cake.”  And therein lies the problem.

So, much of what happened on Tuesday will be misread and misunderstood in Republican circles.  One reelected Florida congressman suggest that congressional Republicans weren’t “conservative” enough.  Oh, yes.  That was the problem.  There definitely wasn’t enough “slash and burn” in the last two years.  Affordable Care subsidies, Medicaid, medical research, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Endowment for the Arts and the Kennedy Center fiasco.  Most important, of course, are the costs of gasoline, hamburger patties, housing, and child care.  The returning stampede of fossil fuels.  Import tariffs.  They’ve been wonderfully effective in returning manufacturing to the US.  Worries about student debt, losses of employment opportunities in the face of an AI takeover.  And the data centers needed to power them.  In fact, everything that maintains our quality of life, unless you’re a billionaire, is in question and doubt.  All of the things about which Orange Man has largely ignored or told us not to worry.  All of the things that voters told him in 2024 should be the focus of his attention.  Forget the ballroom, the Rose Garden, the grand arch, and now the DC golf course.

Vice President Vance blamed it all on the war with Iran.  It “was the war”, he explained.  Not enough “America First” initiatives.  Well, in fairness, Mr. Trump did rename the Gulf of Mexico, Lake Ontario, and most recently New Mexico for us.  And he’s deported almost a million undocumented immigrants, making us far safer than we were.  Except for the critical labor shortages in some key segments of the workforce, the occasional snatching of legal residents, and every so often, a fatal shooting on the streets by ICE agents.  You will notice, though, that interest rates have plummeted as he said they would . . . . . .oh, wait.  No. Inflation is totally under control, though . . . . oh, wait again.  Another no.  In fairness, he has had his successes:  the US takeover of Greenland went smoothly, and it’s just a matter of time before we make Venezuela a US territory, earning him perhaps a second borrowed Peace Prize.  I hope the new ballroom has enough display space for both of them.

Democracy depends to a large extent on balance.  It’s essentially a pendulum, which we know in time will swing back again.  Former Senator Claire McCaskill, speaking on Tuesday night as the election results unfolded, reminded Democrats that they won’t hold on to power unless they’re able to work effectively, and appeal to, moderate Republicans and independent voters.  Increasing numbers of voters identify as independent, not affiliated with either party.  Sticking rigidly to ideology and being unable to compromise doesn’t work well in either our government or our society.  Compromises will have to be reached.  We know that rightest, authoritarian government systems haven’t done well over time.  On the other hand, extreme leftist governments, what we in the past have come to call “communism”, haven’t fared particularly well either.  I think that’s because in either, people don’t feel they have a voice. No, our system – democracy – works best when both sides are free to express their thoughts, exchange ideas, and come to some sort of compromise.

It often comes up in political discourse, and debates, from both right and left that, if the other side prevails, societal collapse is inevitable.  Well, guess what.  Both sides have had their turn at the controls of this country, and we’re still here.  We’ve managed to bounce back from leftist control (or “socialism”, as the right likes to call it) and control by the right (or “fascism”, if you tend more toward the progressive side).  We’ve managed to survive the whole spectrum.  For those that say we’ve never been more divided, I beg to differ.  I recently read a new biography of patriot Samuel Adams, who was deeply distrustful of a strong federal government, despite his efforts to unite the colonies.  He favored a loose union of sovereign states, which didn’t work very well under the Articles of Confederation, to be replaced by the Constitution. The beginnings of our country were messy and divided. The period leading up to, during, and after the Civil War was probably the most conflicted, the most vicious period in American history, and the Cold War of the last century, including Sen. Joseph McCarthy rounding up suspected “un-Americans” wasn’t a whole lot better.  Yes, we have divisions, and yes, we disagree.  We will always disagree. Who’s to blame?  I’d say there’s enough blame to go around.  I remember several decades ago when one party, after a particularly triumphant election, predicted the demise of the other.  Again, guess what?  They’re both still here, and currently are pretty evenly dividing the government.  Which would suggest that voters don’t entirely trust either party with complete control.  So, advancing the causes of cooperation and compromise, stated reelected Congressman Randy Fine of Florida, “So we’re going to be having to fight against stupid policies that they will be pushing. And it’s going to be an ugly two years, but we’re gonna have to explain why all of the things that they said they would do during the campaign are so bad.” Ah, that’s the spirit, Randy.  Your way or the highway.  Or, as my grandfather used to say, “My mind’s made up.  Don’t confuse me with facts.”  The American voter, sometimes a majority of them, may not always be the brightest bulbs in the chandelier – they elected Donald Trump over far superior candidates not once but twice – but over time, they’ll revisit their mistakes.  Like the stock market, there will be a correction.

In a democracy, it’s imperative that issues of disagreement among us are discussed with information and reason.  Not label anything with which we disagree as “stupid policies”.  We need to move well beyond issues like a “stolen” elections, or COVID is a hoax, despite millions of deaths worldwide.  How many consecutive nights do we need to hear the evening news leading off with “fierce storms and severe weather lashing . . . .” before we begin to think climate change may just be a “thing” after all?  The least productive element of a reasonable discussion is fear, and distortions often lead to that fear.  When people lash out in anger, or worse, form their political views based on it, fruitful debate devolves into shouting and finger pointing.  It is therefore essential that respect for opposing views prevail.

What’s next, Democrats?  You have solid majorities, and as we say in football, you’ve been given the ball.  You can run with it, pass it, or punt.  You can either demonstrate that you’ve been listening to voters, and lay out your objectives accordingly, or you can stand down and watch inertia set in.  The latter course won’t sit well with voters in 2028, because they have short memories.  They usually shape their views through their personal situations, their personal economies.  Affordable living spaces.  Affordable child care, because living in America usually means two incomes.  Jobs that offer advancement and a way to live comfortably to retirement. Perhaps less reliance on oil and other fossil fuels, more on cleaner, cheaper energy that won’t damage the environment.  Healthcare that is affordable and allows us to seek medical treatments when we need them.  Pathways to citizenship for those looking for a better life for their families or have been here for decades, not forced deportations to countries unrelated to their places of origin.

So, Democrats, you’re in control now.  Show us what you’re made of, and what you believe in.  That America is the world’s friend, not its bully. That we take care of ourselves, our neighbors, and our allies.  We won’t abide injustice, but we’ll take reasonable action to stop it.   We won’t allow the wealthy and powerful to take what they want, trampling the majority in the process. Most of all, we’ll bring together a coalition that represents, and listens to, all segments of America.  Yep, that’s what is next.  Now is your chance, Democrats.  Don’t fumble the ball.

Trick or Treat – On Election Day

Yes, it’s fast approaching.  The midterm elections, where we elect members of both houses of Congress, along with state and local government officials.  Red and blue, purple, independents, socialists, fascists, libertarians (or as we call them in New Hampshire, “Free Staters”) and anarchist.  Here in the US, unlike many other democracies, where election seasons are reasonably short, November 3rd, 2026 represents the official kick-off of the 2028 election campaigns.  It’s to the political process what a starter’s gun is to a marathon.

Continue reading “Trick or Treat – On Election Day”

The New “Geography”

The “renaming” binge goes on.  President Trump signed an order this past week that makes the former Lake Ontario, the easternmost of the Great Lakes between the Canadian province of Ontario and the US’s New York state into “Lake America”.  It flows into the St. Lawrence River, which may well become the “Grand River of America” by the time you read this. This move hasn’t been quite as spectacularly splashy as his renaming of the Gulf of Mexico into the Gulf of America, which, as we all know, didn’t exactly send mapmakers scurrying back to the drawing board.  But, with a stroke of the pen, and a bit of vengeful rhetoric, the president has managed to divert attention from a host of more pressing national problems, along with centuries of tradition. 

Continue reading “The New “Geography””

The Art of . . . . Deflection

To be totally honest, I had not intended to write about anything related to Donald Trump.  Enough is said, written, and tweeted by and about him that there can’t be anything more.  And yet, somehow, he manages to come up with something new to assault our sensibilities. So, yes once again our Deflector-in-Chief has been hard at work trying to bypass attention from, well, what are uppermost in voters’ minds.  Like the cost of a gallon of gasoline once again topping $4.  So, his declining job approval ratings have driven him to focus on something that hits us all where we live. Accuracy in museum displays.  If you’re like me, you’ve been worrying about that almost as much as you’ve been stewing about contaminated lettuce or the spread of measles.

Continue reading “The Art of . . . . Deflection”

Algae-Gate: Another Conspiracy

You may have seen this in the news, but the latest White House debacle is recent “renovation”, shall we say “clean up” of the Reflecting Pool on the Mall.  If you’re not unfamiliar with this particular national treasure, the Reflecting pool, created over a hundred years ago, is long, shallow pool of water that runs from just beneath the Lincoln Memorial up to the World War II Memorial.  The intent of this particular monument is to provide a calm, reflective water feature that provides a peaceful moment in a city not particularly known for that. Depending on the time of viewing, it can be bluish to greenish, “reflecting” primarily the rapidly growing clumps of algae, along with heavy doses of duck and goose poo that render it a masterpiece of foul smells and pollution. 

Continue reading “Algae-Gate: Another Conspiracy”

Naming Rights – A New Standard

In case you missed it last week, the Florida Legislature passed a bill to rename the Palm Beach International Airport after President Donald Trump, and Governor DeSantis has indicated that he’ll sign the bill.  It totally makes sense, because the president uses it extensively as he jets back and forth between Washington and Mar-A-Lago on Air Force One.

Continue reading “Naming Rights – A New Standard”

While We’re Land-grabbing . . . .

President Trump has made no secret of late that he’s looking to expand the borders of the United States. He’s identified several potential “targets”, and as he’s built his business empire on acquisitions of property, he must know what he’s doing.  His latest target is Greenland, which is apparently rich in natural resources and in a strategically important location.  But, let’s face it, it’s cold – most of it frozen.  How in the world can older Americans flock to a place like that, with few tropical amenities?  Has he never heard the term, “Snowbirds”? We’d assume as his primary residence is now Florida . . . From what I’ve seen, there isn’t a golf course in sight on Greenland.  No pools with swim-up bars.  Its waters are infested with icebergs, and we all know what happened to the Titanic.  Could this be a port of call for cruise ships?  I don’t see it myself.  I say, let the Danes keep it.  Not worth the trouble.

The Canadians too have overwhelmingly resisted joining the United States.  Apparently, the thought of becoming part of the United States of North America hasn’t quite the appeal Mr. Trump envisioned.  Canadians are sticking tenaciously to their sovereignty, along with “O, Canada” and the Maple Leaf.  I have to say, too, that the Canadian Parliament building is a beautiful, old-world edifice, but it does lack a grand ballroom.  Any renovations that Mr. Trump would make, including renaming it “Trump Castle” and converting it to a luxury hotel, would be seriously reduce its value.  That and the fact that Mr. Trump doesn’t speak French.  In fact, his English is barely passable, if his tweets are anything to go by.

Mr. Trump spoke early-on about bulldozing Gaza, relocating the Palestinians, and converting that into a resort area, as it has miles of lovely beaches on the Mediterranean. He dropped that plan when the world expressed a fair bit of outrage, particularly as the Palestinians have been there for thousands of years.  There is the question of where to relocate them.  There are a number of red states that we could make autonomous and give away, although that might meet with resistance from the locals.  

The recent “head-of-state snatch” from Venezuela, followed by Trump’s announcement that the “US would be running Venezuela” in the near future, suggests another option for a 51st state.  Dipping our toe into South American waters, as it were.  A major problem, though, is that ICE agents are deporting Venezuelans currently in the US back to their home country.  If it becomes ours, then where do we send them?  The other big issue, of course, is that, while a certain volume of drugs brought into the US may, or may not, be on those speedboats we’re blowing up in the Gulf of Mexico America, far more is coming through Mexico, assembled from chemicals made in China.  So, if we truly want to cut down on the importation of illegal, lethal drugs, we really should make a play for Mexico.  That’s quite a bit more difficult.  Mexicans are even more resistant to foreign takeover than Canadians.  We’d do well to remember how well Emperor Maximillian, an Austrian prince installed there, worked out in the 19th century.  Although, in fairness, I’d be willing to give them back Texas, if we added Ted Cruz and Governor Abbott into the deal. 

In a recent speech to the World Economic Forum, Mr. Trump awkwardly confused Iceland and Greenland.  True, they’re both ice-covered islands in the North Atlantic.  We also know that, from his first term, when Hurricane Maria hit Puerto Rico, he didn’t seem fully aware that PR is actually part of the United States.  Rather, he thinks it’s an island from which waitstaff and housekeepers come.  Oddly, geography isn’t his strong suit, which is puzzling for someone that has a global empire of often bankrupt resorts.  Perhaps he subconsciously is planning to take over Iceland as well, with its spectacular scenery, hot springs, and all.  Yes, I can just see Trump-Iceland becoming as popular as Trump-Gaza.  

America’s record of empire-building is spotty at best.  We acquired the Philippines, along with Puerto Rico and Guam, only to have to let them go to independence.  We had South Vietnam in the palm of our hands, only to let it slip away.  We installed the Shah in Iran, and that too didn’t work out too well for us.  Nor did Afghanistan.  In fact, the only real land acquisitions we’ve successfully made were the Louisiana Purchase and buying Alaska from Russia.  We could point to the hostile takeover of Hawaii too, where we deposed and imprisoned the Queen, but why quibble over details.  Conquest is conquest. If anyone is up to the task of recreating the great, worldwide empires of the past, a latter-day Napoleon Bonaparte, the very person to lead that charge is Donald J. Trump.  

So, if we’re to recommence adding territory to the United States, my firm recommendation is that we take over warmer lands that we seniors can enjoy.  Tahiti, for example, is isolated and probably unarmed.  It’s ripe for a takeover. Aruba and the Virgin Islands.  I’ve always wanted to go there, but don’t want to have to renew my passport.  We could buy Bermuda from, well, whoever owns it now.  In fact, anything in the Caribbean, or as it will henceforth be known, the Trumpibbean, flowing into the Gulf of Mexico America, is fair game.  Let’s make Jamaica and Cuba Great Again!  Let’s start printing up those new maps and atlases now, and get those hats and t-shirts into production. 

Advanced Citizenship 201

This is a bit more serious than my normal blogs, but from time to time, I feel I need to express them. Protests across the region and the nation this past weekend have really got me thinking about where our country’s leadership, and our core values, are going.  The “No Kings” movement is rapidly evolving into an effective counterbalance to MAGA, which, while still a force, appears to be seeing its support crumbling around the edges. The world is becoming more complex, and for citizens in a democracy, it goes without saying that the voters and the candidates they choose must be as well.  I was listening to an interview recently of a supporter of the current administration.  His views and his responses give us an insight to how the president’s supporters think.  For example, he stated that cities are becoming ‘safer’ because National Guard-essential soldiers (without training in law enforcement, one might add)-are patrolling the streets.  He also feels ‘safer’ because undocumented immigrants are being deported at a rate with no precedent.  Again, he believes the message that “undocumented” equals criminal.  He thought the economy was doing well, probably because he looked older, perhaps retired, and doesn’t particularly care what’s happening in the workforce, where unemployment is low but climbing. He may or may not care much about climate change, food safety, or medical research, perhaps he may think he won’t live long enough to see the results of cuts in the development of those sectors.

Continue reading “Advanced Citizenship 201”

Robbing from the. . . . .poor

We all know the legends of Robin Hood and his band of outlaws.  According to the legend, he was born a nobleman but experienced the inequities of society and decided to correct them.  Whether or not Robin was real or fictional, the notion that the bounties of society are not distributed equally has always been with us.  

Continue reading “Robbing from the. . . . .poor”

The Craziness Is Back – Part II

There’s no doubt – he’s back.  As I wrote before, the man who delights in shocking us has returned as captain of our ship, and he’s heading us straight for the rocks.  Going after perceived   “opponents”, be it Democrats, immigrants, the previous administration, judges, museums, colleges and universities, even law firms. Let’s slash and burn to save money.  Except for a staggering amount on a military parade that nobody wants but him.  A show of power and, dare I say it, ego. Yes, Hitler, Putin, and Kim Jong Un have done it too. Vintage Trump.  MAGA has become synonymous with “Take Control and Run Roughshod”.  

Continue reading “The Craziness Is Back – Part II”